The Supreme Court refused Monday to take up a First Amendment case to revisit a previous ruling enshrining abortion clinic ...

At issue was a 25-year precedent that allows local governments to create protest-free buffer zones around all health-care ...

Supreme Court rejects anti-abortion group challenge to buffer zones, which Thomas called an ‘abdication’ of their duty ...

So what are shield laws exactly, and what does the future hold for them? TIME spoke to experts to find out.

Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented, saying that the precedent deserved a fresh look since the court ...

The Supreme Court refused Monday to hear a pair of cases from abortion opponents who say laws limiting anti-abortion ...

The two cases questioned a longstanding precedent that upheld such laws, which opponents say violate free speech rights.

Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the court’s refusal to reconsider a 25-year-old precedent upholding “buffer zones” ...

The Supreme Court turned away two appeals asking the justices to overrule a 25-year-old decision that allowed for buffer ...

The cities argued that the restrictions were enacted to curb disturbing behavior from protesters outside health care facilities.